Obligatory disclaimer...
Think I'm kidding?
Check this out...
A partial quote. Note the dates between the two lists of headlines.
Like we said, this should shock no climatologist. But consider the “profession” of environmental journalism, which ran these headlines just one teensy month ago:
“Antarctic glaciers shrink” –The Baltimore Sun, April 22, 2005
“Study shows Antarctic glaciers shrinking” –Associated Press, April 22, 2005
“Vanishing glaciers: Antarctica’s big melt” –The Australian, April 23, 2005
“New study points to big melt in Antarctica” – Sci-Tech Today, April 22, 2005
“Antarctic glaciers in mass retreat” –Nature.com, April 21, 2005
“Antarctic glaciers at risk of global warming” – All Headline News, April 22, 2005
“Antarctic glaciers are getting smaller faster” –The Times On-line, April 22, 2005
“Shrinking glaciers confirm the worst” –New Scientist, April 27, 2005
Suddenly the tune has changed:
“As climate shifts, Antarctic ice sheet is growing” –Los Angeles Times, May 20, 2005
“Scientists link global warming to Antarctic’s ice cap’s growth” –Chicago Tribune, May 20, 2005
“Antarctica ice cap thickens” –Pittsburgh Post Gazette, May 20, 2005
“Warming is blamed for Antarctic’s weight gain” –New York Times, May 20, 2005
“Ice sheet confounds climate theory” – The Telegraph, May 20, 2005
“Antarctica ice cap thickens, slowing rise in sea levels” – Pioneer Press, May 20, 2005
Sorry about that - don't know what happened but AGW comment put on weight.
ReplyDeleteThen I realised that the above sounded facetious - an AS thing, I fear. Further apologies.
ReplyDeleteNo worries. It happens. ;-)
ReplyDeleteAS thing?