A WaPo reporter explains her personal Gosnell blackout
But the thing is that I’m getting kind of sick of pointing out egregious bias only to see things not just remain bad but get worse. Just think, in the last year, we saw the media drop any pretense of objectivity and bully the Susan G. Komen Foundation into funding Planned Parenthood. And then we had how many months of coverage focused on someone calling a birth control activist a bad name? And who can forget every pro-life person in the country being asked to respond to Todd Akin’s stupid remarks about rape?
I recommend taking the time to read the full article linked above, and following the links in it. In reading it, I can actually feel Mollie's frustration in her writing. But then, what honest journalist wouldn't be?
The lack of media coverage is not surprising, but it's not the only place where all we can hear are crickets chirping. It's at the ground level, too. The article mentions other controversies - Komen, Fluke, Akin - that the media did cover. When those stories were running, people all over the place were commenting. Social activist types I know were breaking out their protest signs and burning up their blogs with commentary. I couldn't look at my facebook feed without hearing from pro-abortionists making snide updates on their statuses as well as loud commentary as they shared news articles, opinion pieces and blog posts about it.
Yet now? Not a word. Nothing. Not only that but, unless I am looking specifically at pro-life blogs, groups or sites, I'm not hearing it from anyone else, either.
I can understand the silence of pro-abortionists. The Gosnell case is proof that all their defenses for abortion have become meaningless. If they really and truly support abortion "rights", then they cannot honestly say Gosnell did anything wrong, yet it's obvious to even the most shrill among them that what he did is wrong. Not just a little bit wrong in the gray areas, but completely, horrifically, astonishingly evil. If they condemn him, they condemn themselves, and they won't do that.
The silence that really disturbs me, however, is not coming from them. The silence that really bothers me is the one from the pro-life side. Where are they? I realize my exposure to these groups on social media is quite limited, but even just on my own friends list and other contacts, I know there are many who are pro-life, even if they feared to admit it. I know people on email groups that I'm a member of that are pro-life and would be willing to speak out of this were a story about, say, animal abuse or oil pipelines. But these are babies. Human babies being slaughtered. Human mothers being damaged and sometimes killed.
By the hundreds. Possibly more than a thousand.
This case should be enough to bring even those who are on the fence on the abortion issue over. The horrors being revealed during this trial are sickening and shocking. I understand why the news media aren't covering it, but why is it I'm still seeing more people upset over a story about pet abuses or fake stories about Monsanto? What little I am seeing is in very specific sites; places that basically already serve the pro-life community.
I share a lot of stories on my facebook. Sometimes, my shares result in conversations about climate change, politics, homosexuality - sometimes even abortion. Yet with this story, for all the ones I've shared, I've had commentary from only ONE pro-abortion person I know, and this is a person who actually does believe Canada should have limits on abortion.
Where is everyone else??
That is the silence that disturbs me most.